Author: chandler yergin
Date: 16:18:20 01/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2005 at 17:52:07, F. Huber wrote: >On January 08, 2005 at 17:40:54, F. Huber wrote: > >>On January 08, 2005 at 17:28:35, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>On January 08, 2005 at 17:20:57, F. Huber wrote: >>> >>>>On January 08, 2005 at 17:01:04, chandler yergin wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 08, 2005 at 12:20:55, F. Huber wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 08, 2005 at 11:46:22, chandler yergin wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Mrs. Gilbert announced Mate in 35 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Rather Astounding! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Shredder 8 certainly hasn't found it yet.. >>>>>> >>>>>>I´ve now tried both positions with different programs and even with some >>>>>>mate solvers, but none of them have seen any mate yet! >>>>>> >>>>>>So I really doubt, that these mate announcement are correct, i.e. that these >>>>>>positions are absolutly _forced_ mates!? >>>>>>(who else could prove this, if not by the help of computers and mate solvers?) >>>>>> >>>>>>Regards, >>>>>>Franz. >>>>> >>>>> YOU LOSE DUDE! >>>>> >>>>>Haa Haaa Thank You! >>>>> >>>>>I can Post the Entire Game! >>>>> >>>>>The Brilliance of this Young Lady.. well, she was married at the time.. >>>>>so not tooo young. >>>>> >>>>>If you want to Verify... >>>>>Check out: >>>>>White: George Gossip >>>>>Black: Ellen Gilbert >>>>>USA ; United Kingdom >>>>>Telegraphic Match, 1879, Ruy Lopez >>>>> >>>>>Then: tell us this young lady was not an amazing Calculator.. surpassing the TOP >>>>>Programs of Today! >>>> >>>>Sorry, but I don´t get the point of your answer! >>> >>> >>>Dumb as well as Blind! >>>???? >>>> >>>>Would you say, that posting the entire game would be a _proof_ of the >>>>correctness of these mate announcements? >>> >>> >>>Hell Yes! >>> >>> >>>>Even if these games were finished in _exactly_ the announced number of moves, >>>>this is far away from any true proof. >>> >>> >>>Guess ya are Dumb! >>> >>> >>>>I´ve seen already dozens of long mate studies of quite popular authors, which >>>>I (and others) have proved to be completely wrong by the help of mate solvers! >>> >>> >>>BFD! >>> >>> >>>>So again: where is your PROOF? >>>> >>>>Franz. >>> >>>I will NOT keep respondng to DUMBASSES! >> >> >>And _I_ not to people having a vocabulary like yours! >> >>So go on dreaming ... ;-) > >Ok, now that I´ve read through some of your postings at CTF, everthing is clear: > >You are simply NOT ABLE to write in a normal style - >really surprising for a man of your age! I am surprising; and amazing, for a man of ANY age... ;) > >May the wisdom be with you! ;-) As George Bernard Shaw said... "Youth; Too much is wasted on the young.."
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.