Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What reasons would there be for Shredder not to play Kasparov?

Author: chandler yergin

Date: 05:58:41 01/09/05

Go up one level in this thread


On January 09, 2005 at 03:40:06, Sandro Necchi wrote:

>On January 08, 2005 at 22:35:28, chandler yergin wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>>On January 08, 2005 at 21:40:12, odell jones wrote:
>>
>>>On January 08, 2005 at 20:21:56, chandler yergin wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 08, 2005 at 18:00:30, Derek Paquette wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>We've seen Junior and fritz play kramnik and kasparov,.. fritz more than once.
>>>>>Does anyone know if Kasparov/kramnik/topolov will ever get to play Shredder?
>
>I agree with you that ChessBase should chose a different program than Fritz to
>play Kasparov as we saw Fritz more than once, but maybe "someone" in ChessBase
>is a fun of Fritz...:-)
>
>Chess Base should select the program that is the strongest to face the strongest
>chess player.
>
>Since Shredder is leading the SSDF list since years now, we do not see articles
>on Chess Base site on this anymore...maybe it is not news anymore:-)
>
>>>>>
>>>>>At the Men vs Machine world championship, shredder was absent.
>
>Even if asked we would have refused as we had to work on the new Shredder 9.
>
>>>>>
>>>>>when are we going to get to see shredder play a MATCH vs a super grandmaster,
>>>>>and a high profile one at that.
>
>I hope soon!
>It is only a hope as, as far as I know, there is nothing planned on this yet.
>
>>>>>
>>>>>Anyone heard anything? Anyone know anything about this subject??
>>>>>
>>>>>Why not have the strongest computer program playing the humans, atleast ONCE.
>
>I agree 100%!!
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The ELO Performance Rating of the TOP Programs approaches ELO = 2600
>
>This is not correct.
>
>Not considering Hydra, which has a very powerful hardware and talking about the
>top commercial programs the Elo is the following:

Where would Hydra fit into this Category:

Hiarchs 8  Opening Tree based on   1,323,335 Games  Ave Elo 2403   Perf. 2436

Fritz 8    Opening Tree Based on     122,921 Games  Ave Elo 2573   Perf. 2619

Fritz 7    Opening Tree Based on     239,391 Games  Ave Elo 2549   Perf. 2582

Shredder 8 Opening Tree Based on     520,335 Games  Ave ELO 2510   Perf. 2544

Fritz 5.32 Opening Tree Based on     110,503 Games  Ave Elo 2537   Perf. 2584

Who has determined Hydra has a Performance Rating of over 2800?

Who has determined Hydra or any other Program has an Elo of 3000?

How can a Program have an Elo of 200 Points Higher, than the Opponents
it plays?





>
>2200 if the opening is very bad and the position is very bad for them; they do
>not know how to handle it.
>
>3000 if the opening is very good and the resulting middle-game/endgame is
>suiting the program. Also using a powerful hardware.
>
>
>So, the trik is to bring the program in the best suiting positions as much as
>possible to get at least 2800 Elo.
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Where do you get 2600 from???  The Evidence suggest much higher
>>
>>
>>I refer you to a Post and Dialog I had on CTF
>>
>>
>>Thanks for input..
>>>>Hiarcs 8 appears to have the largest & up to date Opening Book of all the Top
>>>>Programs.
>>>
>>>I disagree on that, the size of an opening book has very little to do with
>>>quality. Currently there are 3 opening book experts in the world, 1) Sandro
>>>Necchi (Shredder), 2) Aleander Kure (ChessBase), Jeroen Noomen (Rebel, Chess
>>>Tiger). The author of the Hiarcs opening books I don't consider as a leading
>>>expert.
>
>The size of the book has nothing to do with the quality of the book. Quality
>means selection and "changes" as in the current theory there are a lot fo
>mistakes (moves/variations which are very weak and are shown good).
>If we take the openings books of top programs (Shredder, Fritz, Junior & Chess
>Tiger; just to mention the most famous ones) we can see that there are a lot of
>moves which are not in "human theory" or that the given evaluation is different.
>This means that the book authors have been working on them. Some of them since
>years...
>
>Also when we all meet at the WCCC you can see that the openings books are
>different than the commercial ones and so it would be the same when facing a
>strong human player.
>This is forced to avoid some weaker lines which are in the commercial books to
>increase variety and not to let the opponents know what we would play to avoid
>the opponent prepare against us.
>
>Kramnik asked to get the program in advance and the book also before the match
>against Shredder some years ago.
>We refused.
>This request was changed facing Fritz.
>
>>>
>>>I am not sure about GM Boris Alterman (Junior) and Dan Wulff (Gandalf) as true
>>>experts, they could be but I don't know their work quite well. By a true expert
>>>I mean those people who are walking encyclopedia's when you talk with them about
>>>computer opening theory. Or, when you hear them debating, you don't believe your
>>>ears, they know every dusty place of their large opening books of often more
>>>than 500,000 positions.
>
>Only 500,000 positions?
>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Yet Shredder 8 keeps on going and winning.. so it has to be something
>>>>else.
>>>>What?
>>>
>>>Better search + better chess knowledge. What else?
>>>
>>>Ed
>>
>>  That must be it!  Congrats to the Programmers!  Awesome!
>>
>>I was looking for a relationship between the Opening Tree & Performance.
>>
>>Perhaps you can comment on this.. or see some relationship
>>
>>Hiarchs 8  Opening Tree based on   1,323,335 Games  Ave Elo 2403   Perf. 2436
>>
>>Fritz 8    Opening Tree Based on     122,921 Games  Ave Elo 2573   Perf. 2619
>>
>>Fritz 7    Opening Tree Based on     239,391 Games  Ave Elo 2549   Perf. 2582
>>
>>Shredder 8 Opening Tree Based on     520,335 Games  Ave ELO 2510   Perf. 2544
>>
>>Fritz 5.32 Opening Tree Based on     110,503 Games  Ave Elo 2537   Perf. 2584
>>
>> I note also that the Source of the Fritz Games are those
>>published in Chessbase Magazine.
>>
>>Each Version of Fritz of course has more Chessbase Magazine published games.
>>
>>Anyway... I'll turn 'my' Ponder off, and wait for your comment if any.
>>;)
>>Chan
>>
>>     So, Odell, If you can "refute" the above..please do so..
>>Or
>>STFU!
>>CY
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>Kasparov is/was = 2830  The strongest Player in History!
>>>>
>>>>Progerams have NO intelligence.. they Store & Retrieve Data!
>>>>
>>>>What they play in the Opening is GM Moves.. played before!
>
>This is not true at least since 8 years. I am talking about the top chess
>programs and not only about Shredder.
>
>The reason most people do not know this is because they mainly test without
>books or with books made from games databases...
>
>>>>
>>>>Why would those who know this.. have much interest in a Match like that?
>
>You do not know. This was the case in 1987 when I showed the GMaster opening
>book in Rome at the 7th WCCC which did include new moves and not only those
>which are in chess books and ECO.
>In fact if you take a game won by a strong GM against another one you will not
>be able to play it anymore as the GM did study that game and already decited
>what to change to improve it.
>So the only way to surprise them is to bring something new they are not prepared
>to face...I know it is not easy...but it is the only way.
>
>>>>
>>>>People go to Car Races to see someone Crash into a Wall.
>>>>People watch Human vs Computers to see the Human fall into a Position where the
>>>>EGTB's take over.
>
>This is very unlikely as they take over too late in the game...
>
>>>>
>>>>Fritz Programs have a BUG!
>>>>Other Programs have BUGS!
>>>>The Human.. using the Programs with BUGS; Figure out 'what' the BUG IS,
>>>>and learn how to play to exploit the weakness.
>
>It is not that easy...and we also know our weaknesses and work on them to
>eliminate/improve them in many ways...
>
>>>>
>>>>Cars go faster than Horses... so what?
>>>>Peple still like to watch Horses.
>>>>
>>>>Others don't care, and like to watch Cars.
>>>>So What?
>>>>
>>>>Are you getting my point?
>
>No, I think you are not updated with currently top chess programs.
>
>Sandro



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.