Author: Derek Paquette
Date: 18:59:29 01/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2005 at 17:16:10, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 11, 2005 at 16:12:34, Derek Paquette wrote: > >>On January 11, 2005 at 07:24:49, Rick Hagen wrote: >> >>> >>>Computers took the last round 4-0, to score a final result of 14.5-1.5 >>>Average human elo=2421 >>>Best human perf.: Taufik Halay (FM) Rating : 2299 (1/4) >>>Best comp. perf.: Fritz 8 (4/4) >>>Comps suffered no defeats, humans (especially GM Adianto) missed a draw or two. >>> >>>Greetz, >>>Rick >> >> >>How did shredder 8 do in the tournament? >> >>fritz is known to be good vs humans, and shredder 8 isn't, but how did it do in >>this tournament? > >Shredder8 did 3.5/4 like the other programs except fritz by simple logic > >I get it by the following logic >1)Best comp. perf.: Fritz 8 (4/4) >2)no other programs scored 4/4 so other scored at most 3.5/4 > >4+3.5+3.5+3.5=14.5 >Computers scored exactly 14.5/16 so no program except fritz could score less >than 3.5/4 > >Uri This is shown time and time and time again, computers crushing humans in tournaments, how can anyone not think a computer plays at 2800 elo? on average.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.