Author: Harald Faber
Date: 09:11:59 01/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2005 at 11:48:51, David H. McClain wrote: >On January 12, 2005 at 10:41:06, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On January 12, 2005 at 08:05:42, David H. McClain wrote: >> >>>Harald, >>> >>>Thank you for your tests. It simply proves that at any time, one can and should >>>expect the unexpected. Very interesting, as is your reasoning for your tests. >>>DHM >> >>Thanks for your kind words. >>I tend to play another 20 games Junior 9 - X3D Fritz after the currently running >>Junior 9 - Shredder 8 match. Your bet? ;) > >Harald, > >I probably haven't been doing this as long as you, but I have learned that I >don't "bet" on the outcome of any tests. What I will bet on is that we may be >sure the unexpected can and will happen! If you are asking whether I think >Shredder8 will win? Yes, but I won't bet on it! This was symbolic speaking. And I meant another Junior 9 - X3D Fritz match. Do you expect again some result in the area of 5.5-14.5? >From my own engine matches with J9 and DJ9 on Playchess is that Junior9 is more >than capable of embarrassing any program. What is interesting is that you can >play the same program against someone else with completely different results. >This is what keeps my interest, as do your tests. DHM I haven't checked it on my own but I have the impression that with the white pieces Junior 9 is *much* more dangerous than with the black pieces.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.