Author: chandler yergin
Date: 14:49:17 01/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2005 at 17:39:55, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 12, 2005 at 13:31:16, chandler yergin wrote: > >>On January 12, 2005 at 10:54:26, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >> >>>On January 12, 2005 at 02:33:38, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>In my (private) endgame testsuite Fruit scored better than some programs >>>>with tablebase support (e.g. Junior8 and Crafty). >> >> >>>Quite stunning - it seems, >>>>that excellent search depth compensates TBs! >> >> Your opinion.. Provide evidence! >> >> And my suite has some 5/6 piece >>>>positions were TB access is definitely advantage. >>>> >>>>Jouni >>> >>>IMO the 5-piece tablebases are just not that interesting and really not worth >>>that much in terms of elo. >> >>What are the Current ELO Ratings for Top Programs, including yours? >> >>THey represents exact play, and all positions possible are immediatly shown. >>What more can you expect? >> >> >>> A little endgame knowledge can cover most of the >>>positions and be a lot faster too. >> >>Absolute NONSENSE! > >Not nonsense. > >In most of the position of 5 pieces or less than it computers can find the right >move with no tablebases. > >Uri Nonsense Uri! They "May" find it... Ha Ha.. in how long! Stop the Crap!
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.