Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fruit 2 and endgame play

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 15:27:11 01/12/05

Go up one level in this thread


On January 12, 2005 at 14:26:59, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On January 12, 2005 at 14:02:53, Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
>
>>On January 12, 2005 at 13:01:29, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>>
>>>On January 12, 2005 at 12:42:05, Anthony Cozzie wrote:
>>>
>>>>So let me see if I understand this conversation correctly.
>>>>
>>>>1. I state that the 6 man tables are worth 100 elo
>>>
>>>I thought you were joking, but obviously I was wrong.
>>>
>>
>>I have no quantitative way of accurately guessing this too - but "depends on
>>program" maynot be a wrong statement ?
>>And both are definitely agreeing that there is a non-trivial improvement in
>>performance - right ? Then why disagree for the sake of disagreeing !!!!
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>2. You disagree, and state they are worth 50 elo
>>>>
>>>>3. You do this by pulling numbers out of your ***
>>>>
>>>>4.  Since the full 6-man set hasn't been generated, and the elo gain is almost
>>>>certainly different for different programs, we are both guessing.
>>>
>>>Yes, but in this case Uri's guess is much more educated.
>>
>>Hmm , I dont see how - just 'cos there was a "women" reference ? :)
>>Jokes apart - the point to be taken is - they could be a SIGNIFICANT improvement
>>: and would be the world of difference between a loss and a draw (or a draw and
>>a win).
>>Depends on how you eval , and what you do in your search (extensions and qsearch
>>/threat detection).
>>Ofcourse , if you have a junk endgame eval with quiet decent middle game eval -
>>your improvement can be much higher than what both of them quote !
>>
>>But are we not quibbling over nitty gritty details ?? 50 , 100 , 125 - what does
>>it matter : it would be a substantial improvement !!!
>
>In 20 years, we might be able to memory map the whole 6 man set.
>That would yield a stupendous Elo increase for endgames.

in 20 years computers will be very fast.

faster computer mean less blunders without tablebases and mean that tablebases
are less important.

I suspect that if you wait 20 years more than 90% of the comp-comp games in the
high level will be drawn even without the 6 piece set and 6 piece set will have
smaller influence relative to the influence that it has today.

Uri





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.