Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 02:33:53 01/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2005 at 05:30:55, Rick Hagen wrote:
>On January 13, 2005 at 04:35:09, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On January 13, 2005 at 04:33:51, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>Hello Anson
>>>You are doing the right thing in my opinion. I don't want to
>>>know which program has book learning implied in a better way
>>>thus repeating game by game. I am merely interested in playing
>>>strength of the engines.
>>>Kurt
>>
>> I forgot to mention: another way to solve the problem
>> would be to disable book learning at all.
>> Kurt
>
>Hello Anson, Kurt,
>
>I still believe Nunn or Noomen matches are the best way to test engines.
>A superior book has a major impact on the outcome of such a match, too bad.
>
>Nevertheless, I thorougly enjoy following the S8-Jr9 match :-)
>Keep up the good work Anson!
>
>Rick
Hi Rick
I fully agree.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.