Author: Anson T J
Date: 03:19:03 01/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2005 at 05:33:53, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On January 13, 2005 at 05:30:55, Rick Hagen wrote: > >>On January 13, 2005 at 04:35:09, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On January 13, 2005 at 04:33:51, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>> >>>>Hello Anson >>>>You are doing the right thing in my opinion. I don't want to >>>>know which program has book learning implied in a better way >>>>thus repeating game by game. I am merely interested in playing >>>>strength of the engines. >>>>Kurt >>> >>> I forgot to mention: another way to solve the problem >>> would be to disable book learning at all. >>> Kurt >> >>Hello Anson, Kurt, >> >>I still believe Nunn or Noomen matches are the best way to test engines. >>A superior book has a major impact on the outcome of such a match, too bad. >> >>Nevertheless, I thorougly enjoy following the S8-Jr9 match :-) >>Keep up the good work Anson! >> >>Rick > > > Hi Rick > I fully agree. > Kurt Its true, I might run the nunn test at 40/2 hours after this tournament and perhaps repeat the process with Fritz 8 vs Junior too.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.