Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is Mega Database in danger of becoming FatBase?

Author: Pierre Bourget

Date: 08:42:02 01/13/05

Go up one level in this thread


On January 13, 2005 at 10:46:39, Louis Fagliano wrote:

>The number of games each year in ChessBase’s “flagship database” (their term)
>keeps whizzing rapidly upwards:
>
>Mega Database 1999   1.1 million games
>Mega Database 2000   1.4 million games
>Mega Database 2001   1.7 million games
>Mega Database 2002   2.0 million games
>Mega Database 2003   2.3 million games
>Mega Database 2004   2.6 million games
>Mega Database 2005   2.9 million games
>
>It’s just about 300,000 games per year.  Yet if you were to collect all of the
>new games compiled by Mark Crowler in TWIC for one year you would end up with
>about 75,000 to 80,000 new games for that calendar year.  Where are the extra
>games coming from?
>
>To me it doesn’t look like they’re coming from any good sources.
>
>Case in point:  Take the classic beginner’s opening 1. e4 e5 2. Qh5.  Now I
>would expect that in a quality or “flagship database”, there shouldn’t be any
>more than 5 or 6 games with that silly opening by White.
>
>I did a search to find out how many games in Mega Database 2005 started out with
>1. e4 e5 2. Qh5 and was shocked to find out there are 258 games!!  Even worse,
>White actually wins 94 of those games!
>
>Want more?  Well after 1. e4 e5 2. Qh5 there are a flabbergasting 80 games, yes
>count ‘em 80, where Black replies 2... Nf6?? and loses a pawn instantly to 3.
>Qxe5+.
>
>Is Mega Database in danger of becoming FatBase?  At least in the FatBase product
>they are honest enough to tell you that the games include a lot of garbage.
>Just because all the headers and names are consistent doesn’t mean quality if
>you have hundreds of games that start out with 1. e4 e5 2. Qh5.
>
>Even worse, in their search for more games regardless of how awful, they are
>still leaving out some quality games.  In a few opening treatise’s there is
>occasionally a reference to a game that I cannot find in Mega Database.

I have Big Database 2004 and I intend to get the new BD 2005.Since I am mostly
interested by old games ,could you tell me if there is a substantial increase
for the following period:


0-1900:
1901-1950:
1951-1980:

Thanks.

Pierre



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.