Author: Jason Kent
Date: 10:54:07 01/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2005 at 01:14:52, Sedat wrote: > >Thanks for your interest, > >>1. How did your GUI testing come along? > >After doing some GUI test my opinion are: > >-The mostly engines play differently under all Gui's > >-Even if the engines are playing for the first time under any PC and we repeat >the same position with same engines under same GUI,and then to do the same test >under different pc (but equal proccessor): still there is possibility that the >engines can play, lead to another move. > >* No comments:ChessBase GUI-Fritz 8,Hiarcs 9,Junior 9,Chess Tiger 15 >* Arena,Shredder Clasic... is true choice for UCI engines >* Winboard GUI is most stable for winboard engines > >>2. Why are you still testing 10th Ed with default settings? > >I'd like to see the real strenght of CM10th default settings and then to compare >with the most popular strongest CM10th settings. >Otherwise how can we see,know the strenght difference ?! > >Best, >Sedat The default CM10th settings have already been shown to be worse than the best CM9 settings, and somewhere around the strength of CM9 defaults.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.