Author: Graham Banks
Date: 11:44:56 01/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2005 at 13:54:07, Jason Kent wrote: >On January 13, 2005 at 01:14:52, Sedat wrote: > >> >>Thanks for your interest, >> >>>1. How did your GUI testing come along? >> >>After doing some GUI test my opinion are: >> >>-The mostly engines play differently under all Gui's >> >>-Even if the engines are playing for the first time under any PC and we repeat >>the same position with same engines under same GUI,and then to do the same test >>under different pc (but equal proccessor): still there is possibility that the >>engines can play, lead to another move. >> >>* No comments:ChessBase GUI-Fritz 8,Hiarcs 9,Junior 9,Chess Tiger 15 >>* Arena,Shredder Clasic... is true choice for UCI engines >>* Winboard GUI is most stable for winboard engines >> >>>2. Why are you still testing 10th Ed with default settings? >> >>I'd like to see the real strenght of CM10th default settings and then to compare >>with the most popular strongest CM10th settings. >>Otherwise how can we see,know the strenght difference ?! >> >>Best, >>Sedat > >The default CM10th settings have already been shown to be worse than the best >CM9 settings, and somewhere around the strength of CM9 defaults. CM10th Defaults are definitely stronger than CM9000 Defaults. Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.