Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 10:45:00 01/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2005 at 09:42:15, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >On January 14, 2005 at 03:32:18, Matthias Gemuh wrote: > >>On January 13, 2005 at 21:20:54, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >> >>>Corbit is a moron. Ignore him. >>> >>>The compiler will generate exactly the same code for pieces[BLACK] as it will >>>for p->black_pieces. EXACTLY the same code. So if you want to do it with >>>separate code for sides, you can, and if you don't want to, you don't have to :) >>> >>>I used to have it like Crafty, but then I switched to something similar to your >>>scheme. Of course, if you think the other format is neater, than go for it. >>> >>>anthony >> >> >> >>Moron ? Otherwise I tend to agree 100% with you. >> >>/Matthias. > >Eh, I was feeling a little cranky :) It was an accurate assessment. In fact, you will see in my follow-up post yesterday that I agreed with Anthony.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.