Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 08:41:37 01/15/05
Preface: In the context of a Booktuning, I an own opening match book created
themselves (70 MB largely, approx. 70000Games) which I would like to provide now
first of all with a coarse sanding with approx. 1000 lightning games, to it only
the fine cross section comes, played I so far approx. 100 games on chess to over
also see de which others in its books to have. In such a way 1000 games are to
become, and so that will stress whole ones some months. For testing the book I
use Fritz, Shredder and Ruffian. If I have about 12 new games, then I examine
the games after leaving the book. Some positions (independent of the result!)
show myself then, as not well for computer programs and delete I her in such a
way. Some positions however are good, also were lost, because the loss was not
because of the book. Such variants gotten then further book courses in addition
according to which the “Ausspielwahrscheinlichkeit” rises. In order to test in
addition, the less probable openings, I closed the main openings last times to
the test completely.
Here such a game (My PC is only a P3 600, my opponent J9 hase 15000 kn/s):
Original german text:
Vorwort:
Im Rahmen eines Buchtunings, ich habe mir ein eigenes Eröffnungs-Matchbuch
kreiert (70 MB groß, ca. 70000 Partien) das ich jetzt zunächst einmal mit einem
Grobschliff mit ca. 1000 Blitzpartien versehen möchte, danach erst kommt der
Feinschliff, spielte ich bisher ca. 100 Partien auf Schach,de um auch zu sehen
was andere in ihren Büchern haben.
Es sollen 1000 Partien so werden, und so wird das Ganze einige Monate
beanspruchen. Zum Abtesten des Buches nutze ich Fritz, Shredder und Ruffian.
Wenn ich etwa 12 neue Partien habe, dann überprüfe ich die Stellungen nach
Verlassen des Buches. Manche Stellungen (unabhängig vom Ergebnis!) erweisen sich
dann, als nicht gut für Computerprogramme und so lösche ich sie. Manche
Stellungen aber sind gut, auch verloren wurde, weil der Verlust nicht am Buch
lag. Solche Varianten bekommen dann weitere Buchzüge dazu wonach die
Ausspielwahrscheinlichkeit steigt. Um aber auch die weniger wahrscheinlichen
Eröffnungen zu testen, sperrte ich die Haupteröffnungen zuletzt mal zum Test
ganz.
Hier eine solche Partie:
[Event "Wertungspartie, 5m + 0s"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2005.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Wolkenlos, Fritz 7"]
[Black "KISK002, Junior 9"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B26"]
[WhiteElo "2335"]
[BlackElo "2580"]
[PlyCount "153"]
[EventDate "2005.??.??"]
1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nc3 {0} Nc6 {0} 3. g3 {0} g6 {0} 4. Bg2 {0} Bg7 {0} 5. d3 {
0} d6 {0} 6. Be3 {0} Rb8 {0} 7. Qd2 {0} b5 {0} 8. Nge2 {0} b4 {0} 9. Nd1 {0}
Nf6 {0} 10. f3 {7} h5 {16} 11. Bg5 {9} d5 {4} 12. O-O {8} dxe4 {2} 13. fxe4 {3}
Ng4 {10} 14. h3 {0} Nge5 {13} 15. Ne3 {1} h4 {6} 16. g4 {9} f6 {0} 17. Bf4 {8}
O-O {2} 18. Rad1 {12} Be6 {9} 19. Nd5 {12} g5 {15} 20. Bh2 {0} Rc8 {14} 21. Qe3
{7} Nd7 {8} 22. e5 {11} Ndxe5 {15} 23. Qxc5 {0} Kh8 {7} 24. Nxb4 {9} Nxb4 {9}
25. Qxb4 {0} Rxc2 {6} 26. Nd4 {7} a5 {0} 27. Qa4 {8} Rxg2+ {2} 28. Kxg2 {0}
Qd5+ {4} 29. Nf3 {3} Nxf3 {0} 30. Rxf3 {5} f5 {1} 31. Kf2 {12} Bxb2 {14} 32. d4
{4} f4 {0} 33. Bg1 {6} Qxa2 {0} 34. Qxa2 {6} Bxa2 {0} 35. d5 {5} a4 {0} 36. Rd2
{6} Rb8 {2} 37. Ke1 {1} a3 {2} 38. Bd4+ {2} Kh7 {3} 39. Be5 {1} Bb1 {4} 40.
Bxb8 {5} a2 {11} 41. Be5 {0} Bxe5 {4} 42. Ra3 {0} a1=Q {4} 43. Rxa1 {0} Bxa1 {2
} 44. Re2 {1} Bf6 {3} 45. Kf2 {1} Kg6 {2} 46. Kf3 {3} Kf7 {0} 47. Rd2 {4} e5 {3
} 48. dxe6+ {0} Kxe6 {3} 49. Re2+ {2} Kd5 {3} 50. Re8 {1} Bd3 {2} 51. Re1 {3}
Bc2 {1} 52. Re8 {3} Bd1+ {0} 53. Kf2 {4} f3 {0} 54. Ke1 {4} Be2 {0} 55. Rxe2 {3
} fxe2 {2} 56. Kxe2 {3} Ke4 {0} 57. Kf2 {3} Bd4+ {2} 58. Kg2 {2} Kd3 {0} 59.
Kf3 {3} Be3 {0} 60. Kg2 {0} Ke2 {0} 61. Kh2 {0} Kf3 {0} 62. Kh1 {0} Bd4 {0} 63.
Kh2 {0} Bg1+ {0} 64. Kh1 {0} Ba7 {0} 65. Kh2 {0} Bd4 {0} 66. Kh1 {0} Bg1 {0}
67. Kxg1 {0} Kg3 {0} 68. Kh1 {0} Kf2 {0} 69. Kh2 {0} Ke2 {0} 70. Kg2 {2} Ke3 {0
} 71. Kf1 {2} Kf3 {0} 72. Kg1 {0} Ke4 {0} 73. Kg2 {2} Kf4 {0} 74. Kf2 {2} Ke4 {
Wolkenlos,Fritz 7 bietet Remis 0} 75. Kg2 {0} Kf4 {0} 76. Kf2 {0} Ke4 {0} 77.
Kg2 {(Lag: Av=0.24s, max=0.5s) 1} 1/2-1/2
Here is Junior 9 winning! But he plays a Blunder, and games was draw!
Am Ende stand hier Junior 9 auf Gewinn, aber er spielte den Gewinn nicht aus,
sondern ließ auf kurioser Weise Fritz 7 ins Remis entkommen.
Wie ist das möglich? Hat Junior 9 einen weiteren BUG?
Diagramm:
Wolkenlos,F - KISK002,J, Wertungspartie, 5m + 0s 2005
[D]8/8/8/6p1/6Pp/5k1P/8/6bK b - - 0 1
Analysis by Junior 8:
64...La7 65.Kh2 Ld4
-+ (-5.19) Tiefe: 3 00:00:00
64...La7 65.Kh2 Ld4 66.Kh1
-+ (-5.40) Tiefe: 6 00:00:00
64...Kg3!
-+ (-5.49) Tiefe: 6 00:00:00, tb=2
64...Kg3 65.Kxg1 Kxh3
-+ (-#13) Tiefe: 6 00:00:00, tb=4
64...Kg3 65.Kxg1 Kxh3
-+ (-#13) Tiefe: 6 00:00:00, tb=4
(Nemeth, Privat 15.01.2005)
But last moves are:
64.Kh1 0 64...Ba7 0 65.Kh2 0 65...Bd4 0 66.Kh1 0 66...Bg1 0 67.Kxg1 0 67...Kg3 0
68.Kh1 0 68...Kf2 0 69.Kh2 0 69...Ke2 0 70.Kg2 2 70...Ke3 0 71.Kf1 2 71...Kf3 0
72.Kg1 0 72...Ke4 0 73.Kg2 2 73...Kf4 0 74.Kf2 2 74...Ke4 Wolkenlos,Fritz 7
bietet Remis 0 75.Kg2 0 75...Kf4 0 76.Kf2 0 76...Ke4 0 77.Kg2 (Lag: Av=0.24s,
max=0.5s) 1 ½–½
:)
How ist this possible? Have Junior 9 a other BUG?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.