Author: Madhavan
Date: 20:20:33 01/15/05
chess cannot be solved,machine can ponder on about 4 million moves per second,but they are relatively too weak even a strongest grandmaster makes a silly mistake in openings if you consider chess can be solved,then what is the probability that the top grandmaster can get a draw against "chess solvable" machine? if grandmaster cannot get a single draw in a series of 5 games,then it is obvious that chess should be switched to fischer random chess as kramnik said in an interview Kramnik: You know, sometimes I think I have understood a position, but after a couple of years I realize that I have understood nothing. That is what is so mysterious and fascinating about chess. You have a board with 64 squares, and it is so deep that not even ten Kramniks can know which is the best move. Sometimes you simply feel lost. You cannot feel the ground. Spiegel Online: Are you afraid of the depth? Kramnik: It is sometimes painful. You simply cannot reach the ground. This ground or call it final truth, if it exists at all, is not of humans. Spiegel Online: Will a machine ever be in a position to light up the darkness? Kramnik: I don’t think so. Not even the strongest computers even come close to the ground. Spiegel Online: What does the machines lack? Kramnik: The strongest computer, against which I played in October 2002, can examine four million positions per second. You can work out how many it plays through in six or seven minutes but they are too weak. dont post utter nonsense like "there are z million possible moves" it takes z^z number of moves to slolve chess"
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.