Author: Günther Simon
Date: 02:20:04 01/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2005 at 23:20:33, Madhavan wrote: No one here said chess can be solved practically, there was just speculation if it could be solved theoretically. Personally, I dont believe it, but who knows what is in hundred years...it's really boring to see people annoyed about something, which _might_ happen far beyond their lifetimes. >(A)chess cannot be solved,machine can ponder on about 4 million moves per >second,but they are relatively too weak >(B)even a strongest grandmaster makes a silly mistake in openings A has nothing to do with B... >(A)if you consider chess can be solved,(B)then what is the probability that the top >grandmaster can get a draw against "chess solvable" machine? >(C)if grandmaster cannot get a single draw in a series of 5 games,then it is >obvious that chess should be switched to fischer random chess Again A has nothing to do with C and B is of no interest for A and vice versa... I wonder why all the trolls come out with this issue again? Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.