Author: Madhavan
Date: 07:54:32 01/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2005 at 05:20:04, Günther Simon wrote: >On January 15, 2005 at 23:20:33, Madhavan wrote: > > >>(A)chess cannot be solved,machine can ponder on about 4 million moves per >>second,but they are relatively too weak >>(B)even a strongest grandmaster makes a silly mistake in openings > >A has nothing to do with B... Machines are too weak(claimed by Kramnik)see the original thread Grandmaster find it difficult to make a best ever move that can be made > >>(A)if you consider chess can be solved,(B)then what is the probability that the top >>grandmaster can get a draw against "chess solvable" machine? >>(C)if grandmaster cannot get a single draw in a series of 5 games,then it is >>obvious that chess should be switched to fischer random chess > >Again A has nothing to do with C and B is of no interest for A and >vice versa... if chess is solved and no program or grandmaster can defeat the "chess solvable" machine then switch to fischer random chess > >I wonder why all the trolls come out with this issue again? so Kramnik is a troll? >Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.