Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 2 points Chandler One Point for you to Ponder

Author: Anthony Cozzie

Date: 09:18:20 01/16/05

Go up one level in this thread


On January 16, 2005 at 12:16:53, Anthony Cozzie wrote:

>Please find the error in one or more of these statements Chandler:
>
>1. A tablebase access takes at least 2-3 ms, even on a 15K SCSI hard drve.
>
>2. Most engines (except for Diep ;) have evaluations that take a few
>microseconds or so.
>
>3. Therefore a tablebase access is on the order of 1000X slower than calling the
>evaluation function.
>
>4. Since most of the time is spent in the evaluation function, this means if the
>programmer called tablebase_probe() at every node it would run 1000X slower,
>that is 1K nps instead of 1M nps in Zappa's case.
>
>Note that we are talking about positions with (say) 8 pieces on the board; for
>example this KRPPPvKRP position.  White wants to keep his passers together and
>win, Black hopes to split them and (possibly) draw.
>
>[D]8/8/r6k/6p1/6P1/5P1P/R6K/8 w - - 0 1
>
>When a lot of people (experts especially) think something, it is usually good to
>at least consider their position.  They might be wrong anyway, but they probably
>have at least some justification for their opinion.  I get the feeling that you
>never read anything I write, but I keep trying for the sake of world (or at
>least forum) peace anyway :)
>
>anthony

OK, I suck at creating FENs by hand :)  but you get the point.

anthony



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.