Author: gerold daniels
Date: 13:14:34 01/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2005 at 13:52:44, Christopher Morgan wrote: >Best free engine? Fruit 2.0 v Aristarch 4.50 - Blitz 6'+6" 58-44 > > >Except for Kurt’s recently posted engine matches, test results posted recently >here seem to indicate Fruit 2.0 may, at this time, be the best free engine >available. Comments? > >I found that Fruit 2.0 easily disposed of Crafty 19.17 and Pro Deo 1.0 in blitz >6'+6" engine matches on my machine. Closest free engine competitor appears to >be Aristarch 4.50. Results: > >Fruit 2.0 57% +43/-29/=30 58/102 >Aristarch 4.50 43% +29/-43/=30 44/102 > >Blitz 6'+6", AMD 64 3000+, 768MB RAM, 192MB hash, Shredder 8 GUI, ponder off. No >end game tablebases, alternating colors. > >Book for both: Book made from 8,825 games, both players 2600+, wins only, no >draws, file name: CAM - 2600 plus both wins only.ctg extracted from CB’s Big >Base 2003 plus added to that database TWIC 2003, 2004 to date and Convekta 2003, >2004, no duplicate games. No book learning, max variety of openings. > >I DO NOT claim that this one test is in any way definitive as to which free >engine is best, of course, but it does support the notion that Fruit 2.0 is a >very strong engine. > >Book and games available on request. Email me at camorglaw@adelphia.net. > >Chris hi chris way to early to tell how strong fruit is it does play a pretty wild game. so far i have it about even with prodeo but to few games to tell. not quite as strong as rufian 1.0.5 list 512is a little stronger in the games i have played. i only play 2/6 blitz games so it may play better at longer time . not played it with aristarch yet.been using the arena giant book with fruit. gerold.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.