Author: Madhavan
Date: 09:06:34 01/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2005 at 11:43:18, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 17, 2005 at 06:06:00, Madhavan wrote: > >> >>>> >>>>Other Programs had a Big Bug in them.. perhaps it's fixed now, >>>>but, a few years ago, it was obvious that to Beat the Top Programs, >>>>White gets a Stonewall Position, and demolishes Black on the Kingside! >>> >>>Feel free to log on to ICC and show me this. I'll be willing to let Crafty play >>>you as many games (Crafty black) as you want, you always playing the Stonewall. >> >>rather than calling rated players to ICC,and claiming "chess can be solved" >>can you post the game that has no errors on both sides? > >Can you please grab your dictionary first? "can be" is _not_ the same as "has >been". >Chess is a provably finite game. It can not go on forever due to the 50-move >rule (not to mention 3-fold repetition). Any finite game can most definitely be >solved, given enough time. Or fast enough hardware. But not today. Not yet... i agree with that,you didnt claim "chess has been solved" but you did claim " Any finite game can most definitely be solved"with faster hardware" i deny that,strongest program running on a faster hardware should not get a draw or lose in many games against super grandmasters,if it does then it is considered as not solved >Who can post a perfect game? Who could evaluate such a game and prove it is >perfect, until chess is solved... >> >>>>Put up any complicated Position, and let 5 Programs evaluate it! >>>> >>>>Tell me they ALL eval the pV the same? >>>>NONSENSE! >>> >>>So? Neither do humans. You seem to overlook that... >>>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.