Author: Larry Griffiths
Date: 22:48:13 01/23/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 1999 at 16:30:24, James Robertson wrote:
>In my prog I have written:
>
>void Func(int **i) {
> __asm {
> mov eax,i
> mov ebx,[eax]
> }
>}
>
If the code shown above is exactly as you have it in your program,
and your compiler supports inline functions, may I suggest that
you try:
inline void Func(int **i) {
You may have to check your compiler options to see if something has to
be turned on to use inline functions. Compilers may not honor
the inline keyword if the function has assembly code or for loops, while
loops etc. I use inline to eliminate the overhead of call and return.
I started using macros after looking at Robert Hyatt's Crafty program
as this also eliminates call and return overhead.
Just some ideas...
Larry.
>I am hoping there is some assembler instruction that combines both operations
>into one.
>
>Later on in the function I have:
>
>void Func(int **i){
> __asm {
> mov eax,i
> mov ebx,something_useful
> mov [eax],ebx
> }
>}
>
>Is there any way to shorten this? Mr. Nalimov mentioned that Intel has a file
>somewhere with all the assembler instuctions explianed, but I downloaded it in
>Acrobat format, and I am too lazy to download Acrobat. Figured it would probably
>be a little easier to post here. :)
>
>James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.