Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: CM10_Ellwein (based on Graham's post about strong settings)...

Author: Dan Ellwein

Date: 17:14:52 01/17/05

Go up one level in this thread

On January 17, 2005 at 19:46:48, Jason Kent wrote:

>I think both Queen values should be more close or equal.  Selectivity is better
>at 13 or 14.
>
>Jason

okay Jason, thanks, I'll keep that in mind...

>On January 17, 2005 at 19:09:35, Dan Ellwein wrote:
>
>>CM10_Ellwein (Dan Ellwein)
>>
>>Own
>>Centre=105
>>Mobility=105
>>King Safety=155
>>Passed Pawns=105
>>Pawn Weakness=105
>>
>>Opponent
>>Centre=100
>>Mobility=100
>>King Safety=115
>>Passed Pawns=100
>>Pawn Weakness=100
>>
>>Material (both own and opponents)
>>P=1.0
>>N=3.1
>>B=3.2
>>R=5.3
>>Q=9.4(own) Q=9.0(opponent)
>>
>>Selectivity=12
>>A/D=0
>>M/P=0

• Re: CM10_Ellwein (based on Graham's post about strong settings)... Graham Banks 17:24:27 01/17/05
  • thanks Jason and Graham for the input... Dan Ellwein 18:07:47 01/17/05
    • Selectivity 12 might be okay for blitz, but not longer time controls Graham Banks 21:48:25 01/17/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.