Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Interesting Mate in 10

Author: Alessandro Scotti

Date: 07:55:24 01/18/05

Go up one level in this thread


On January 18, 2005 at 08:41:37, F. Huber wrote:

>IMO "32000 minus distance" is not a good idea for stating a mate value, since
>this is absolutely non-standard, and so every existing GUI would certainly
>show a completly nonsense mate value!
>I think you should either stay with the distance to 10000 (this is the way that
>TheKing does it), or even better switch to the PGN/EPD-standard evaluation
>of mates, which counts from 32768 - maybe you should have a look at
>http://www.drb.insel.de/~heiner/Chess/PGN_Standard.txt
>and go to the section ´16.2.5.6: Opcode "ce": centipawn evaluation´.

Hi Franz,
I use 32000 in Kiwi and Arena seems to display the score correctly. I don't
think 10000 or any other number is better or makes work particularly easier for
the GUI. In fact, when I was designing my own GUI, I decided that it was a good
idea to run a simple "mate" and "get mated" test on new engines when possible,
so that returned scores could be compared with known values.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.