Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 20:02:11 01/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2005 at 08:06:22, Harald Faber wrote: >On January 18, 2005 at 06:20:42, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On January 18, 2005 at 05:25:34, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>Ooops, this is not much, see my other post. Hiarcs 9 on XP1800+ (1533MHz) / >>>192MB hash does 210-215knps in that position. >> >>yes. but i used a PC ! And the Intel Cpu was 1000 mhz faster then the G4. >>So what do we learn out of this ? >>That Intel sells shit cpus :-)) > > >You are talking bullshit again and again. Not missing any opportunity to throw >mud at Microsoft, Intel and Chessbase. Are you on any mission? Well, the only CPU Intel makes that is worth its wait in MHz for chess is Centrino. They are along the same lines of the non-b.s. P3 style of MHz rating (vs. actual performance.) P4's ratings were purely for a shock & awe sales scheme -- not worth the lost in trust of consumers that know the difference (in my opinion.) -elc. > > >>But it also shows that the G4 with 1.25 is not a lame CPU for chess, >>otherwise it would show weaker NPS concerning hiarcs. > > >It DOES. > > >>Overall you get much for the 489 EURO it will cost . > > >Depends on the point of view.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.