Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Beauty In Chess..The Differences Between Human And Computer Play

Author: Fernando Villegas

Date: 13:58:06 01/20/05

Go up one level in this thread


Dear subdit:
Perhaps human likesness has to do less with beauty -a too much variable concept-
than with error. Errors make human behaviour what it is. And then the capacity
to fix them. Or resilience to go on waiting the other guy to commit a mistake.
And capacity to make profit of the mistake...or do it wrongly.
That's why we, when writting or shooting movies where we want to describe a
robot or a non human device, perhaps an alien kind of entity, we almost ever
make use of kind of purely lgica, cold, error-proof behaviour.
Mistakes, light or deep, serious or not, give human behaviour the flavor it has
and even, sometimes, his dignity.
Look at the greek tragedy. It almost comes from a fundamental mistake done long
before the play begins and in fact the script is about how the tragic character
endure the consequences.
I remember that fine, smart chess player, Tartakower, saying that chess exist by
his mistakes.
Just my grain of powder
 Ferdinand, King of Royal mistakes



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.