Author: Roy Brunjes
Date: 10:13:02 01/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2005 at 23:58:03, Gordon Rattray wrote: >Hi, > >What is regarded as state-of-the-art for the auto-annotation of a chess game? I >believe that in the past Fritz has won awards for this functionality. Is Fritz >still the best for providing "human like" annotations to a chess game? Any >other software that people find useful for this? > >thanks in advance, > >Gordon While Fritz may have won awards for this in the past, I believe the more proper way to state things would be to say that the ChessBase GUI wins the award. The "English" (or German or ...) is inserted into the analysis by the GUI I believe. The engine used to search through the game does matter in the sense that a different engine may generate different variations as analysis. However I think that the non-chess content (such as "No better is xxx" and "A nice try here that proves insufficient is xxx") is provided by the GUI. That is what it seems like to me at least. I have no idea when ChessBase last made improvements to that portion of their GUI though. Roy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.