Author: William Kerr
Date: 16:43:06 01/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2005 at 18:54:38, Ignacio Santos Crespo wrote: Thats what made it such a tough mate in 5. You are right it is a mate in 9 not 5. My mistake. Bill >On January 23, 2005 at 18:07:13, William Kerr wrote: > >>[D] Rr6/6k1/2PK1p2/6p1/4p3/4P3/4bP2/R7 w - - bm Rxb8;id Tough mate in 5; >> >>Some engines or most dedicated chess computers take awhile for this one. > > >It´s mate in 9. > >ChestUCI Ver.3.7: >FEN: Rr6/6k1/2PK1p2/6p1/4p3/4P3/4bP2/R7 w - - >Search for 1. Mate in 62 ... (Hash=512MB) > 9 03:25 57.247.909 366.644 +M9 Ta8xb8 >Search completed ... (Time=204.86s) >Mate in 9 found ! (1. Solution in 03:24) > 9/9 03:25 73.206.114 357.348 +M9 Ta8xb8 Ae2g4 c6c7 Rg7g6 Tb8g8+ Rg6h7 c7c8D >Ag4xc8 Tg8xc8 g5g4 Ta1h1+ Rh7g7 Th1h8 g4g3 Rd6e6 g3g2 Tc8g8+ > >Ignacio.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.