Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 09:18:33 01/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 2005 at 12:16:07, Duncan Roberts wrote: >On January 24, 2005 at 12:04:56, Dieter Buerssner wrote: > >>On January 24, 2005 at 11:53:38, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>> It might require the square of that (so 50,000*50,000 acres). >> >>Dann, think again about this :-) Also, assume for a moment, you had given the >>area in square miles instead of acres. Now square that area, or in square light >>years - you will come to the conclusion, that almost no space at all will be >>needed ... . And of course, if you square an area, you don't have an area >>anymore, but rather something with dimentsion length^^4. >> >>Cheers, >>Dieter > >after running your program overnight, I found that the nps went down a lot. >can anything be done about this ? It't probably a good thing. It means the hash table was getting lots of hits. I bet if you look at the time to ply, it was getting less and less as time went on. NPS is a misleading indicator much of the time.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.