Author: Tanya Deborah
Date: 20:00:48 01/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 2005 at 12:38:59, David Dahlem wrote: >On January 24, 2005 at 12:33:24, adam wilks wrote: > >>I tested Fritz 8 bilbao in Chessbase with King 3.33 in Chessmaster 10 K >>interface(using default settings) in 5 minute games. King 3.33 won 3, drew 2 >>and lost 1. Does this reflect king 3.33 strength? If not what are the optimum >>settings to find its optimum strength(i e through what opening books? should i >>use theor own or custom made books like AMD XP or 5moves ctg? Or should i run a >>tourney with both engines over the John Nunn test? as this last idea might have >>a better grasp of an engines strength? or should i not include an opening book >>and let the engines just play chess themselves? > >Six 5-minute games reflects nothing. :-) Hello! I dont understand this... Then, in humans games should be the same thing. but this not happen in humans games. When a GM won against another GM, for example for 10-4 or 12-7 in a match, all the people say that he is clearly better, but in computer games is very different. People say that they need to look more, and more, and more games to know exactly what program is really better.. WHY? In human games, GM´s plays for about 20-24 games max in a match. Too in World championship matches. And when the Grandmaster won his match, all the people say : ok, the grandmaster that won is really better in chess than the other GM. I dont understand, why this not happen in Computer games. Tanya >Regards >Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.