Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: question to Prof Hyatt on environmental care.

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 15:04:51 01/25/05

Go up one level in this thread


On January 25, 2005 at 16:32:58, Duncan Roberts wrote:

>On January 25, 2005 at 16:25:28, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On January 25, 2005 at 16:13:01, Duncan Roberts wrote:
>>
>>>My understanding of dann corbit is that a 32 piece tablebase needs a 2.5 * 2.5
>>>cube of crystal.
>>>
>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?407489
>>>
>>>
>>>This is considerably less than a galaxy and perhaps could be slipped pass
>>>greenpeace, although I think you were referring to all games.
>>>
>>>anyway is this calculation anywhere near right ?
>>>
>>>
>>>duncan
>>
>>
>>I honestly have no idea.  First, I really don't know how big the actual game
>>tree for chess will be.  It could be _very_ big if the game goes on and on with
>>every 50th move being a pawn push or capture to restart the 50 move rule.  Or it
>>might be that it is a forced win or draw or loss inside 50 move, with best play.
>> Until we know how big the tree really is, it is hard to predict how much
>>storage will be required to hold it.  For the worst case, where some 5500 moves
>>are possible before it becomes a forced draw (forced in that I assume one side
>>will claim the draw if the other side will not, otherwise the game becomes
>>infinite and all bets are off) that is so big that it is impossible to estimate
>>anything about it.  There are positions with a branching factor of one (one
>>legal move) as well as positions with a branching factor of over 200.  When
>>talking about W^D where D is big and W can get big, I personally lose focus. :)
>
>
>but to store a 32 piece tablebase would be a lot 'smaller'.
>
>might  a 2.5 by 2.5 kilometre crystal  do the trick ?
>
>
>duncan

The size of that is easy to compute.  you start off with one piece on any of 64
squares.  That takes 6 bits.  Another piece on any of the remaining 63 squares.
This turns into 64*63*62*61...*33...  which is about 2e55 if I did my math
right.  Or another way is 6 bits * 32 pieces = 192 bits = 2^192 = 6e57.

Both are big numbers.  If you can store that many _values_ in a crystal of that
size, then you are set.  note that win/lose/draw is not good enough here, you
need a mate in N value, not just win/lose/draw or you can't play the game and
win when you should.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.