Author: Jason Kent
Date: 04:36:55 01/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2005 at 07:25:29, adam wilks wrote: >i have been testing cobra and it falls short of fritz 8s strength. Cobra is a huge setting, but it is very specifically tuned to long (standard) games with time controls like 40 minutes per 40 moves and even longer. Does anyone >know cobras strength in comparison to Kurts chessmaster settings on his website. Kurt's settings were very good back when he tested, but I think I can safely say progress has been made on CM9 and CMX settings since he has stopped testing. >As the No 1. Schumacher is stronger than fritz 8, (not shore by how much, but in >five 5 minute blitz games using 5 moves ctg, schumacher blew fritz apart in its >own gui 4.5-0.5. Schumacher is probably the strongest blitz setting for CMX. If you try it against shredder 8 at longer time controls, it will struggle a bit. But still an excellent setting, and possibly the best all-around setting at the moment. Kurt are you currently testing anymore parameters from your >website as they are severly strong.Knowing there are seemingly unlimited no.of >combinations of the parameters when testing. I would like to know wheather there >is a set criteria for the numbers of pawn structure, king safety and the others >would stay within, like do they stay between 100-200? The highest numbers I have seen are around 196, but I think it is possible to go to at least 199. Perhaps the limit is higher, but I don't think it would be useful. The number can go as low as 1. Jason
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.