Author: Ingo Bauer
Date: 09:15:54 01/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
> So you say that it is a fact that Shredder 9 will play better against humans >than Shredder 8. > And you said that this is for more than one reason. You said that the one is >because it's generally a stronger engine, but you don't give the second reason >to support your statement....... I did, one reason that it is generaly better, the other is the better play in anti-computer-chess. Two reasons or am I wrong? Does SMK imported any anti-human >algorithms........? Or it plays much better at closed positions? Or it avoid >closed positions? Where your statement is based on? I do understand that some people are very curious, but I can only repeat what I saw in some games and what I read in some eMails. > And i don't really understand the "It will throw away much less games now." >I don't think that Shredder 8 was unsuccessful against humans, throwing many >games against them. Why do you say this......? Throwing away in Anti-Comp-Games or very closed positions. At the end of the time it sometimes starts to throw pieces and lost then. Btw: The backward analytical capacity is much better now. If you analyse a game S9 will memorize a former position much longer then before. Pls do not ask anything about that I have not seen the code, I just see the result which I allredy described. Ingo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.