Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 12:33:10 01/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2005 at 12:15:54, Ingo Bauer wrote: >> So you say that it is a fact that Shredder 9 will play better against humans >>than Shredder 8. >> And you said that this is for more than one reason. You said that the one is >>because it's generally a stronger engine, but you don't give the second reason >>to support your statement....... > >I did, one reason that it is generaly better, the other is the better play in >anti-computer-chess. Two reasons or am I wrong? Oh, OK. I just wanted to know how it managed to improve in anti-human play? But i imagine you don't know everything. Sorry for being too curious.....:-) > >Does SMK imported any anti-human >>algorithms........? Or it plays much better at closed positions? Or it avoid >>closed positions? Where your statement is based on? > >I do understand that some people are very curious, but I can only repeat what I >saw in some games and what I read in some eMails. Yes i'm too curious. Sorry if i've made you looking for answers....... > >> And i don't really understand the "It will throw away much less games now." >>I don't think that Shredder 8 was unsuccessful against humans, throwing many >>games against them. Why do you say this......? > >Throwing away in Anti-Comp-Games or very closed positions. At the end of the >time it sometimes starts to throw pieces and lost then. > >Btw: The backward analytical capacity is much better now. If you analyse a game >S9 will memorize a former position much longer then before. Pls do not ask >anything about that I have not seen the code, I just see the result which I >allredy described. >The champ of backward analysis is/was YACE! :-) Yes absolutely is YACE! Thanks for the valuable information. I hate looking information about Shredder 9 at Chessbase and see old known things............:-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.