Author: Joshua Haglund
Date: 00:52:38 01/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2005 at 02:54:18, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On January 30, 2005 at 01:32:56, Joshua Haglund wrote: > >>I think chess engines should not be given an approximate rating. I think they >>should be given an ELO RANGE, and be ranked by the average of the ELO RANGE. >>There shouldn't be an engine on the list unless it has played more then 5000 >>games. These games are consisting of different books, hardware, settings, etc., >>hence, giving the engine an ELO RANGE. > > > <snip> > The only thing > that counts for me is the relation between the many engines > on the basis of hundred/thousands of games. > Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com] That is one thing I try to show. :) Joshua Haglund toneewa@yahoo.com
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.