Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:18:43 01/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2005 at 08:51:56, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On January 30, 2005 at 05:51:41, Ziad Haddad wrote: > >>Deep Fritz7 is the most serious opponent for Shredder8 even if it's no longer >>the top Fritz program (at least at Blitz TC) > > No doubt, Deep Fritz 7 is a serious opponent for > Shredder 8 but who has played a 50 games match > between these two engines when the winner was > not Shredder 8 (but please no bullet or blitz > games). From Stuart Taylor's reply I took it for > granted that there would be an engine being able to > win regularly and most of the time vs Shredder 8. > And such an engine does in my opinion not exist -:) > Kurt I do not know What about haddad setting for shredder7.04? I remember that I read that they may be better than shredder8 based on haddad tests. Some questions: 1)What are exactly the setting? 2)Is it possible to use them under chessbase? 3)Did people except ziad haddad test them seriously to have opinion if they are stronger than shredder8? I prefer to read opinion of more than one person. It is not that I do not trust Mr. haddad but different opponents or different time control may lead to different results and I also interested not in the book but in the analysis capabilities of the engine so I am interested to hear data about games from predefined positions like the nunn match or using some external book for all programs. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.