Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 10:02:53 01/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2005 at 10:31:14, Mike Byrne wrote: >On January 31, 2005 at 09:42:27, Mark R. Anderson wrote: > >>Mike, >> >>Thanks for the info, but you didn't say which program you were using on your >>Zire 31 ... Hiarcs or Genius, perhaps? I have both Hiarcs and Genius on my >>trusty old Palm 130 at 34 mhz (non-ARM) and am looking to upgrade to something >>like a Tungsten T3 to utilize much more speed, more hash, and the ARM-optimized >>versions of both programs. I will compare with yours and see how truly slow my >>machine is! Thanks. >> >>Mark Anderson > >I didn't test the Genius, but I will give ger a shot. Genius took over 11 minutes on the Palm while Genius on PPC took over 5 minutes both units were running overclocked - 294Mhz for the Palm amd 590 Mhz for the PPC. PF2 did nit see it after 10 minutes on a Dell PPC running at 590 Mhz. PPC Ruffian on the same unit finds it almost instantly, then changes it mind then come back to it in less than a minute. Standard Pocket Crafty Classic needs some time, however Morpht Pockey Classic plays it just about instantly and never lets go. More from the relative overvaluation of the pawn and increase king safefty parameters factors to play sacrifices like this then any real search result.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.