Author: James T. Walker
Date: 17:31:06 01/25/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 1999 at 14:28:04, KarinsDad wrote: >On January 25, 1999 at 14:16:00, KarinsDad wrote: > >[snip] >> >>And if I was really getting tricky, I would encode my next frequency into the >>transmission and have redundancy checks, etc. I would have a transmitter in my >>shoe and receive binary responses back between shoes (3 bits from square, 3 bits >>to square) and I would send the move back to verify that it is correct (same >>with when the computer makes a move). > >Duh! 6 bits from square, 6 bits to square, and I would separate these to >minimize errors such as 3 bits from rank, wait 2 seconds, 3 bits from file, wait >2 seconds, 3 bits to rank, wait 2 seconds, 3 bits to file. And possibly put a >wake up signal before this: Wake up, I'm about to send you a move. > >KarinsDad :) If you know anything about electronics you know that this is childs play. Any transmitter strong enough to get outside of the playing area would be easy to detect. You don't have to read the signals, just know they are there. Then finding the cheat would be pretty easy, especially over a period of a couple of days. Jim Walker
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.