Author: Thomas Mayer
Date: 11:35:53 02/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Vincent, On February 01, 2005 at 14:30:22, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On February 01, 2005 at 14:22:26, Thomas Mayer wrote: > >>Hi Vincent, >> >>On February 01, 2005 at 14:05:50, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On February 01, 2005 at 14:02:18, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On February 01, 2005 at 12:20:30, Thomas Mayer wrote: >>>> >>>>You mean like this? >>>> >>>[D]8/8/P4b2/2K3k1/8/8/8/8 b - - >>> >>>1-0 >>> >>>Whereas : >>>[D]8/8/P4b2/2K3k1/8/8/8/b7 b - - >>> >>>Is a draw. >>> >>>And if you remove the f6 bishop it's a win for white again. >> >>thanks... your example kills my second idea... so I must return failure when 2 >>bishops are present... I could create rules which even would cover those >>problems, but for a fast routine they would be to complicate... >> >>It's always good to have an FM handy... :) > >Thanks. > >The question is where you worry about. If you have a 5 men EGTB already who >cares about extrapolating 4 men info from a 5 men egtb? The idea is simple -> deep in the search or in the qsearch I have only my 4 men bitbases... it's good to have exact results here for some 5-men... :) I can guess sometimes even 6, 7 or 8men results... I am quite sure that it will work, but as I have said in another post -> when it is programmed I will present some results... (If it works like I hope it should work...) -> in that respect kb*kp* is now the first really interesting recognizer / special endgame I am programming... but there is more to come... :) Greets, Thomas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.