Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 14:20:25 02/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2005 at 14:35:53, Thomas Mayer wrote: >Hi Vincent, > >On February 01, 2005 at 14:30:22, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On February 01, 2005 at 14:22:26, Thomas Mayer wrote: >> >>>Hi Vincent, >>> >>>On February 01, 2005 at 14:05:50, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On February 01, 2005 at 14:02:18, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 01, 2005 at 12:20:30, Thomas Mayer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>You mean like this? >>>>> >>>>[D]8/8/P4b2/2K3k1/8/8/8/8 b - - >>>> >>>>1-0 >>>> >>>>Whereas : >>>>[D]8/8/P4b2/2K3k1/8/8/8/b7 b - - >>>> >>>>Is a draw. >>>> >>>>And if you remove the f6 bishop it's a win for white again. >>> >>>thanks... your example kills my second idea... so I must return failure when 2 >>>bishops are present... I could create rules which even would cover those >>>problems, but for a fast routine they would be to complicate... >>> >>>It's always good to have an FM handy... :) >> >>Thanks. >> >>The question is where you worry about. If you have a 5 men EGTB already who >>cares about extrapolating 4 men info from a 5 men egtb? > >The idea is simple -> deep in the search or in the qsearch I have only my 4 men >bitbases... it's good to have exact results here for some 5-men... :) I can >guess sometimes even 6, 7 or 8men results... I am quite sure that it will work, >but as I have said in another post -> when it is programmed I will present some >results... (If it works like I hope it should work...) -> in that respect kb*kp* >is now the first really interesting recognizer / special endgame I am >programming... but there is more to come... :) > >Greets, Thomas You risk an evaluation error which is real huge when you evaluate something to a win which in fact isn't a win :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.