Author: Andrew Walker
Date: 15:49:11 02/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2005 at 06:20:19, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >My Statement (with internet-translate): > >Is clear that junior 9 for the point "fights". > >It is in such a way clear in addition, that Hiarcs 9 is likewise in the top >group represented, and it does to all such programs well if it closely next to >each other stands. No more humans are interested in the SSDF Rating of Hiarcs 8 >(why also?) I for one am very interested in seeing its rating compared against the newer engines. How else can we know how much they have inmproved or not? although H8 with approximately 2680 SSDF Elo stands there very >well. With approximately already 1000 played portions can it hardly still fall >if it by J9 is not flat-rolled! For J9 however (it played there still very few >portions) however each point counts which it to it-gotten, if he wins against an >older engine clearly. My "estimation" after (perhaps it can exactly calculate >someone?) J9 would be fully in the target if he about 22-18 against Hiarcs 8 >wins. If it wins more highly, then it gets probably more points awarded, which >continues to bring it to the point. However if junior 9 and Hiarcs 9 would play >against each other, then one would have to bite in the grass, it was the match >ends very scarcely 20.5-19.5 or 20-20 (in the top group only few Points the >programs separate from each other). > > It's hard to understand what you're point is. The SSDF games are played against a wide variety of opponents so that the results are meaningful. It also helps to see if the new versions really are significantly better than the older versions. This cannot be done if they only play against opponents within 20 or 30 points!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.