Author: Bahram Namjou
Date: 17:01:31 02/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
I am surprised that you never heard this!...The fact that default parameters of haircs9 is not optimum has been in many disussions since 2003...you can find some of them in the past messages with submitted games...Generally most people agree that style: aggressive, and hypermodern should be on...I add two other factors for "long games only" (shown in previous email) and I think it even become better...that my personal experience...no data to submit right now... On February 01, 2005 at 08:25:45, George Sobala wrote: >On February 01, 2005 at 06:12:06, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On February 01, 2005 at 00:36:44, Bahram Namjou wrote: >> >>>As you know the default parameters of hiarcs9 is not optimum. I suggest change >>>the Hiarcs parameter to the following and do the same test under the same >>>condition: >>>Style: Aggressive, threat depth=0, combination= on!, Hypermodern=on >>>then please re-send the result here...thanks >> >> Never heard that default parameters Hiarcs9 would not >> be the best ones. If you have other experience, please >> post results with your settings over total 300-500 games. >> You can't expect a tester to repeat a match simply on >> the basis of your statement. >> Kurt > >Nor could one draw any conclusions after 10 games of one then 10 games of the >other (unless there was a *phenomenal* improvement!). > >I agree with you, Kurt!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.