Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 09:17:08 02/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2005 at 11:55:17, pavel wrote: >On February 02, 2005 at 11:04:44, Steve Maughan wrote: > >>Uri, >> >>>I do not think that 30 elo is a huge step forward. >> >>IMO 30 ELO is significant at the level of Shredder. But I would also say that I >>consider a 30 ELO improvement the minimum for a release. >> >>>I do not say that it is bad but I saw bigger improvements(see the improvement >>>in fruit that is more than 200 elo in less than a year from fruit1 to fruit2). >> >>IMO there is no way that you can reasonably compare the improvement of Fruit 1 >>to Fruit 2 with that of Shredder 9. They play in a different league. Don't get >>me wrong - I'm a great fan of Fruit. >> >>Steve > > >For instance, its very much unlikely that fruit3 will be 200elo better than >fruit2 in less than a year; because of the level of chess fruit2 is playing >right now. That's on the one hand. On the other hand, I would not be shocked to see another 200 Elo improvement on the next iteration.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.