Author: Andrew Walker
Date: 15:02:59 02/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2005 at 06:12:06, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On February 01, 2005 at 00:36:44, Bahram Namjou wrote: > >>As you know the default parameters of hiarcs9 is not optimum. I suggest change >>the Hiarcs parameter to the following and do the same test under the same >>condition: >>Style: Aggressive, threat depth=0, combination= on!, Hypermodern=on >>then please re-send the result here...thanks > > Never heard that default parameters Hiarcs9 would not > be the best ones. If you have other experience, please > post results with your settings over total 300-500 games. > You can't expect a tester to repeat a match simply on > the basis of your statement. > Kurt I remember seeing some experiments by Thorsten Czub on this that look similar to what was posted. However I don't think there were enough games to come to any solid conclusions. I've just found the page I was thinking of at http://f50.parsimony.net/forum200336/messages/1369.htm Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.