Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 6-man TBs

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:55:42 02/03/05

Go up one level in this thread


On February 03, 2005 at 14:36:33, Eugene Nalimov wrote:

>On February 03, 2005 at 13:57:11, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On February 03, 2005 at 13:37:09, Peter Skinner wrote:
>>
>>>On February 03, 2005 at 11:47:03, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>Nor do you know anyone that said someone did.  That's your lack of reading
>>>>comprehension, not anything else.  who exactly said someone uses "all" of them?
>>>
>>>I have used them all at one point, but just like you I have run out of hard
>>>drive space in my beast. Now all total I use 523.71gb of tablebases when playing
>>>online. I use Hiarcs and Crafty, and I believe those are the only two that
>>>support 6man bases at this time.
>>>
>>>The start up time for each program is considerable. In fact just last night I
>>>saw a position where Hiarcs thought it was up +2.35 then the 6man tbs clicked in
>>>and suddenly it found a mate in 42 moves. I will find the exact game and
>>>position and post it here.
>>>
>>>>>In fact i don't even know anyone who has them all besides you. But well, you
>>>>>don't even know how to back them up seemingly :)
>>>
>>>I have them all. Either on my hard drives, or backed up on DVD. I do have them
>>>all though. Just ask my provider who cried over the bandwidth I used :)
>>>
>>>I downloaded roughly 10.5GB nightly until I had them all. Depending on the ftp's
>>>speed, I seen a high of downloading 38.94GB in one night.
>>>
>>>Peter
>>
>>
>>For the record, crafty takes about 25 seconds to "start up" on my dual xeon,
>>with nearly 600 gigs of "stuff" in the TB folder.  About 500 gigs is on 146gig
>>10K U320 scsi drives, the rest is on 36gig 15K U320 scsi drives.  I have 3x146
>>in raid-0 (striping for performance) and 3x36 in raid-0 as well..
>>
>>I don't consider that unacceptable...
>
>You probably should re-think which TBs you should use now, when you got new TBs.
>On the last disk I sent you there are some TBs that I believe are more useful
>than ones that you currently use -- kpppkp (and kxppky in general), krpkrp, etc.
>
>Thanks,
>Eugene

I have done (and am doing) just that.  Never fear.  :)




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.