Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 08:29:44 02/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 04, 2005 at 07:27:29, adam wilks wrote: >I do not se the reason to apologize as if you read what i said i did not say >that swami has anything to do with the tsuanmi. I said "in relation" to what you >originally said. I think you should accept responsibility for this as you >started this post about "swami" when it clealry wasnt being used and did not >have to be used. [QUOTE] "Posted by adam wilks (Profile) on February 04, 2005 at 03:05:29: In Reply to: Moderation/ the end of "swami" name calling .... posted by Mike Byrne on February 04, 2005 at 02:56:26: *snip*I detect some hints of stereotyping as you refer "swami" to Indians which i think is totally unacceptable and inappropriate considering the tsunami disaster a month ago."[/QUOTE] To me what you wrote here states you believe the use of "swami" correlates as an inappropriate use of the word due to the tsunami a month ago. I also don't see "in relation" at all. I believe that you should be apologizing to Mike... and rather quickly. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.