Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Why not a dual Opteron ?

Author: Mike Byrne

Date: 10:11:21 02/05/05

Go up one level in this thread

On February 05, 2005 at 12:44:48, Ray Banks wrote:

>Aren't they better performers for chess ?

$$$   I priced a dual Opteron 250 at around $4500.  It would be 50% faster, at a
almost 4x the cost.  My accounting and cost control background prohibits me from
being able to  justify 50% increased performance at 4x cost.

If I become independently wealthy, I may reconsider.

• Fair enough Ray Banks 12:00:21 02/05/05
  • Re: Fair enough Mike Byrne 12:20:24 02/05/05
    • Re: Fair enough Ray Banks 12:52:54 02/05/05
• Re: Why not a dual Opteron ? Alan Grotier 10:31:43 02/05/05
  • Re: Why not a dual Opteron ? Mike Byrne 10:47:00 02/05/05
    • Re: Why not a dual Opteron ? Alan Grotier 11:30:52 02/05/05
• Re: Why not a dual Opteron ? Gian-Carlo Pascutto 10:14:54 02/05/05
  • Re: Why not a dual Opteron ? Mike Byrne 10:31:29 02/05/05
    • Re: Why not a dual Opteron ? Gian-Carlo Pascutto 10:42:40 02/05/05
      • Re: Why not a dual Opteron ? Mike Byrne 10:47:53 02/05/05
        • Re: Why not a dual Opteron ? Michael P. Nance Sr. 15:14:16 02/05/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.