Author: stuart taylor
Date: 07:42:54 02/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2005 at 09:05:00, Jason Kent wrote: >On February 09, 2005 at 08:28:59, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On February 09, 2005 at 08:25:16, Jason Kent wrote: >> >>>On February 09, 2005 at 08:18:10, stuart taylor wrote: >>> >>>>On February 09, 2005 at 07:48:36, Jason Kent wrote: >>>> >>>>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Wrath 30.0-15.0 66.67% >>>>>Shredder 9 UCI - Pro Deo 1.1 26.5-18.5 58.89% >>>>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Solomon 27.0-18.0 60.00% >>>>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Schumacher 31.5-12.5 71.59% >>>>>Shredder 9 UCI - CmX C3PO 23.0-21.0 52.27% >>>>> >>>>>138.0-85.0 61.88% >>>>> >>>>>223 out of 400 games played >>>>>Level: 5 Minutes/Game >>>> >>>>This last one seems quite a strong contender! >>>>Are all these CmX's different settings for Chess Master 10? >>>>S.Taylor >>> >>>Yes all of these are Chessmaster 10th Edition settings, except for ProDeo of >>>course. >> >>If so, then does that not mean that CM 10 might have a setting about as strong >>as the new Shredder? >>S.Taylor > > >CXM C3PO (by Wilhelm Hudetz) may or may not be the strongest CM 10th setting. >This test is only comparing performance against Shredder 9 at 5min. It will be >interesting to see how C3PO turns out with more testing. Wilhelm is of course >the creater of the very strong R1 setting for CM9000 so I expect good settings >from him. :) > >Jason So he's the champion setter? I wonder what he knows that others don't. Maybe some kind of intuition? S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.