Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 14:57:33 02/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2005 at 12:12:42, William Penn wrote: >On February 10, 2005 at 08:23:24, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On February 10, 2005 at 01:15:59, Ray Banks wrote: >> >>>On February 09, 2005 at 22:55:01, George C Williams wrote: >>> >>>>Anyone have The Shredder 9 Chessbase version with the CB interface and all? >>> >>> >>>London Chess Centre say they will have it Thursday afternoon UK time. My order >>>is in ! >> >>Why bother? The UCI version is great and essentially bug free. Compare that to >>the Chessbase version. >>(The version 24 update at Playchess.com is still full of bugs and fixes nothing. >> This is probably the 10th edition of the version 24 update) > >I agree that the SC version (from shredderchess.com) is a bright star in the sky >and will probably get brighter. It mostly lacks the versatile database features >of CB at this point, but compensates with some unique new operational features >available only in the SC version: ability to include/exclude moves for analysis, >access 800GB online tablebases, etc. But I'm not so negative about the CB >version in advance, which I haven't seen. CB does indeed have problems with >their GUI and it's not clear when or if they will fix it. If I were them, I >would take 3-6 months off from all other projects and give it a major fix-it >effort, but I'm not them!? >WP What is actually the big problems with the CB interface? I never have any big problems with it! And by the way, you can not use UCI engines the "real" chessbase. (AT least not in version 8) So if you use ChessBase for anything I would choose the CB version. Torstein
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.