Author: Alan McCracken
Date: 16:38:56 02/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2005 at 18:15:06, Dann Corbit wrote: >On February 10, 2005 at 18:03:22, Alan McCracken wrote: > >>Hmmm...I guess I'd better submit tougher moves in the future;-) > >Are you kidding? I am green with jealousy that you found that move in game in >two minutes time control. Quite a few computers could not find that single move >in two minutes on a very fast computer. > >>Thanks to all who replied! >> >>To CM users, could you please post the best settings for CM9K and CM10K, thanks. >> >>Terry No, I wasn't kidding, I want to find even harder moves, like I did several days ago with Bxh7, which stumped computers! However, that was a game in 15 minutes and played over the board. Nevertheless, thanks for the compliment! A little secret, when I play such quick games, moves like Rxh3 come intuitively, and I don't work out every detail, which entails some risk, computers _have_ to work out far more details to realize such moves. If they could be tuned to look at a position more like a human master or grandmaster and then back it up with computer calculations to _prove_ the move, then we may be facing unbeatable programs/machines, which I don't think is too far off now. Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.