Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: good job peter

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 20:58:11 02/13/05

Go up one level in this thread

On February 13, 2005 at 22:29:52, mike schoonover wrote:

>hi peter,
>good job at cct7.thank you and zek for all that you did.
>i was rather disapointed i could'nt run smarthink due
>to technical issues,it would have been fun.
>looking foward to cct8.
>regards
>mike


I agree.  Ignore the resident naysayer, complainer, whiner, world's foremost
authority on everything, world champion chess programmer if it weren't for (a)
his book;  (b) his computer;  (c) his opponents cooking his book;  (d) his
program bugs;  (e) you fill in the current excuse of the day here.  The event
went pretty smoothly, although I think we need more discussion about _ZERO_
human intervention.  Zero means ZERO, not almost-zero.

• Re: good job peter Uri Blass 03:51:33 02/14/05
  • Re: good job peter Robert Hyatt 07:39:18 02/14/05
  • Re: good job peter Uri Blass 03:58:06 02/14/05
    • Re: good job peter Robert Hyatt 07:41:15 02/14/05
• This was raised.... and I thought addressed... Peter Skinner 21:43:17 02/13/05
  • Re: This was raised.... and I thought addressed... Matthew Hull 21:49:22 02/13/05
    • Re: This was raised.... and I thought addressed... Matthew Hull 21:53:00 02/13/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.