Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 23:33:41 02/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 13, 2005 at 22:54:27, Graham Banks wrote:
>On February 13, 2005 at 20:14:21, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On February 13, 2005 at 13:46:25, Graham Banks wrote:
>>
>>>THE GREAT CM9000 SHOWDOWN!
>>>
>>>Athlon XP1900+
>>>128mb hash each
>>>3,4,5 men tablebases
>>>Ponder on
>>>No opening books
>>>34 rounds (2 cycles) at 40 moves in 80 minutes repeating
>>>
>>>
>>>Standings after Round 1
>>>
>>>1.0 - Mapi
>>>1.0 - Minotaur
>>>1.0 - Pillen
>>>1.0 - Slayer 2b
>>>0.5 - Alliance
>>>0.5 - Assassin
>>>0.5 - Judge
>>>0.5 - Judge II
>>>0.5 - Justice
>>>0.5 - RIX
>>>0.5 - SKR
>>>0.5 - Slayer
>>>0.5 - Surak 8c
>>>0.5 - TO5
>>>0.0 - Gladiator
>>>0.0 - Minotaur 2
>>>0.0 - R1
>>>0.0 - R2
>>
>>
>>Can you also include the original CM9000 without personality, for strength
>>comparison.
>>
>>Jorge
>
>
>That was my plan originally, but somebody requested that I include Gladiator, so
>I left out Default to accommodate this request.
>Everybody knows that Default doesn't hack it with most or all of these settings,
>especially at longer time controls on faster machines.
>Default is included in the 40 moves in 2 hours tournament that I'm running on an
>old P3 450. Even here it's not faring so well! I'll post the result of that
>tournament soon (9 settings, 80 rounds).
>
>Graham.
This was a wrong decision in my opinion. It could be
that default plays comparatively stronger vs internal
CM-settings than vs other engines. I remember my earliest
tests with CM8k and different settings when default was
almost best and eventually stronger than most other settings.
Kurt
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.